Antigone Essay - The Complexity of King Creon

The story for Sophocles drama, Antigone, is determined when King Creon decrees that the form of Eteocles testament be honored with a prudish burial, while the body of his brother, Polyneices, will be leftover to rot in the open. The conclusion ultimately leads to Creons demise. While the vestigial governmental principles behind Creons resolve were initially sound, his decision to let the body of Polyneices rot ultimately becomes just as morally based and irrational as Antigones stubborn decision to bring back the body a proper burial. Antigones actions inflame Creons own ontogeny insecurity, which prompts him to turn what was a political issue into an issue of private principle and ego.\nAs utmost as tactical political decisions go, it is ballpark practice to marque an cause out of the competitor especially somebody who commits imposition as a hindrance to other potential enemies or traitors. In Elizabethan England traitors were hung, pinched and quartered, with their dismembered bodies displayed throughout London; in the Odyssey, Odysseus makes a gruesome example out of the treasonous goat herder Melanthius, cutting of his nose, ears, hands and feet and so feeding his genitals to the dogs (Homer 352). Polyneices is fundamentally a traitor a person that was once a citizen of Thebes (and a part of gallant lineage, no less) who left and lastly involved himself in an fervour on his old home. agree to Creon, Polyneices was active to burn [Thebes] to the ground, prepared to drink blood that he shared, and to throw the rest into slavery ¦  (Antigone 187-189). The Argives intended to install Polyneices to the throne, so Creons take might be slightly embellished: certainly, burning prevail over the very city you were rubbish for power over defies common sense. That being said, Polyneices was prepared to land his own blood (he succeeded in killing his brother) as Creon stated, and its harmless to assume that the Argive ground fo rces would have killed, exiled or enslav...